What is the fastest front-end framework
The recent past has been a time of great excitement for front-end engineers as the three major web frameworks have been releasing new versions one at a time so we can see more powerful web frameworks. Ember 2.0 was released 2 months ago and upgrading from 1.0 to 2.0 is very easy. React to the released version 0.14 a few weeks ago. There are also many popular front-end frameworks such as Backbone, Knockout, and Aurelia. If you want to develop a web app, it is recommended to use one of the three frameworks Angular, Ember or React. It can be said that these three frameworks represent the highest level of security, technically very sophisticated frameworks, and there is a lot of technical community support. So you have problems again as to which framework to choose when developing web apps, which is better to use, more secure and more powerful? This article describes the advantages and disadvantages of the new versions of the three frameworks and compares them. I hope you find it useful.
Angle 2.0 (Compared to 1.0 it has changed drastically)
Angular is one of the most popular frameworks right now. When Angualr1.0 was first released, a lot of people in the industry were shocked. It took the MVC framework to the next level. The release of Angular has been very well received by many web developers. However, Angular 2.0 is a sorrow, a complete innovation beyond 1.x, or a destructive upgrade. The Angualr2.0 version redefines the framework and has seen very large changes. It can be described as a very dramatic change. Angualr2.0 does not support backward compatibility, so upgrading from lower versions to version 2.0 is a dead end. However, the software industry is always full of wonders and geniuses. The Angular team has shown a clear path to upgrade from Angular 1.X to 2.0, making the upgrade a gradual improvement process. I want to officially save Angular because of this method.
What are the exciting features of Angular 2.0?
Angular 2.0 reduces some unnecessary features and improves Angular's performance. For example, $ scope will be removed from Angular 2.0 and replaced with ES6. In addition to making the framework itself more concise, there are a few other notable features:
The improvement in performance is to be expected. If you're very familiar with Angular, you can already break down functions and building an app is no problem. There is always a way to resolve performance issues.
- Native app support
Using Angular to develop native apps is the biggest improvement on version 2.0. The Agular team and React will be combined to use React to render native native apps at the end of Angular 2.0. A new generation of hybrid apps can be implemented. The execution process is the same as for local apps, but it can be at the logic layer. Can be shared on multiple platforms.
- Server-side rendering functions
Angular 2.0 finally implemented the server-side rendering, the server-side rendering functions were improved, the loading time of the first page was reduced and the search engine optimization can be improved through dynamic pages. The web app experience is vastly improved due to the improved speed in rendering pages.
Why choose Angular?
The major improvement to Ember 2.0 removes the features that were not previously recommended and aims to become a leaner framework. Programs that run under Ember 1.13 can be seamlessly converted to Ember 2.0.
- Ember 2.0 also adopts ES2015 functional modules, classes and decorators.
- The project distribution structure has been changed to use the "pod" classification instead of the functional classification (controllers, models, components, etc.).
- The controller was removed to support routing controls.
- The extended server-side renderer reduces the loading time of pages and optimizes search engines.
Who is better suited to use Ember
Ember is the best choice for implementing a web app. As mentioned above, many apps use the built-in Ember framework. Ember is also accepted by the Ruby Association. If you choose Ruby, Ember is your best bet. There are many resources available to you, such as: B. Documentation, technical blogs, etc.
Ember is a very good choice for those buying tools that include frameworks. We often waste time looking for, researching, and evaluating some development frameworks. EMber gives you many options, and all of them are very valuable. Everything has advantages and disadvantages, but everything works fine then choose Ember.
React1.0 is the lightest framework among the three frameworks. React renders UI controls very well and is often used in pairs with other frameworks. However, it is more common to use it in conjunction with the Flux architecture.
Flux has a completely different architecture than MVC, similar to the React ecosystem. FaceBook created React to ensure the consistency of the appearance of multiple pages. This effect was achieved by using REACt. It offers incredible performance and server-side rendering effects. Both functions are perfectly implemented. An interesting phenomenon is that both Angular and Emver are trying to release new versions. React continues its innovations in its areas of expertise.
Main functions of the React1.0 version
1. Update the project website
2. Update the framework document
3. Improve the robustness of the animation
The main purpose of React enhancements is to improve the developer experience. One of the highlights of React is that it is very easy to create animations using the elements provided by React.
Who is better suited to React?
React is a great choice for developing new projects or improving existing ones. The React framework makes it very easy to create the app UI and rebuild the UI. If you want to gradually improve an existing project, React is very suitable. React projects are usually written in ES2015. If your value is marginalized or you just need some simple libraries in the application framework, React is your best bet.
Comparison of the three frameworks
The first thing to say is that the three frameworks can cover all needs. The functions of these frameworks are unique. Many good design and implementation ideas were fully taken into account in the three frameworks.
Ember can be considered the fastest starting frame. However, Ember's cost of learning is higher. For the final app, an app developed by Angular JS needs to write very little code.
As can be seen from the image above, the advantages of why the three main frameworks are so popular are obvious. The three frameworks are not absolutely good, only in relative terms which one better suits the needs of the project and the functions required for app development. The three frameworks will support server-side rendering faster and better in future development. Angular and React supports native UI controls for IOS and Android. Many things can be done in the future with these three frameworks.
Original link: http://smashingboxes.com/ideas/choosing-a-front-end-framework-angular-ember-react
- What is a fermion
- Lyndon B Johnson was a warmonger
- Who stressed you this year
- Why were the Apollo missions stopped
- Where can I enroll in an Agile course
- What are some of the best slogans
- How do matrices help with engineering
- Should Twitter moderate the POTUS
- Can an electric field exist without charged particles
- How is the Turkish country seen in Serbia?
- Canvs is a good social listening tool
- Which fruit name starts with MULBE
- How did the man discover copper?
- How big is Fulda Germany
- How is the annual EPS of a company calculated?
- What design services do you offer
- Who is your favorite acoustic fingerstyle guitarist?
- Raag Desh is an underrated film
- Why do we get vibrating colors
- What is a brief definition of tRNA
- What famous person is following you on Quora
- What is the lifestyle of Bangalore like
- How do you afford your first motorhome?
- What are brave instrumental music